![]() | ||||
| Amanda Rocks the Urban Yoga by watsonic (2008) |
The following is an excerpt from Chapter 3 of my new book, Yoga Ph.D.: Integrating the Life of the Mind and the Wisdom of the Body.
When it comes to the popular understanding of yoga history
today, it seems that modern yoga just can’t get any respect.
This rankles me. Because as I’ve studied the history,
tracing yoga as we know it back to its most immediate roots in late 19th-early 20th
century India, I’ve come to believe that the modernization of yoga that
occurred at that time was, in fact, a really good thing.
Yet from the tone of the discussion surrounding the
publication of Mark Singleton’s groundbreaking Yoga Body (as well as, to a
lesser extent, other recent historical studies) you wouldn’t think this could
possibly be the case. Rather than seeing the modernization of yoga as a
positive, creative, and even visionary response to a rapidly changing world,
most practitioners view it with either indifference or hostility.
Of course, there’re always exceptions to the rule. But from
what I’ve seen, the most common response to the compelling historical evidence
that asana as practiced today only dates back to the early 20th century is
either to 1) shrug off one’s initial disillusionment and not care, or 2) denounce
this fact as evidence of the corruption and degeneration of an ancient
spiritual tradition.
And this, I believe, is a shame. Speaking as a practitioner,
I believe that there’s much wisdom and inspiration to be found in the short but pivotal
lineage of teachers who were formative in the making of modern yoga,
stretching from Swami Vivekananda in the late 19th century to Sri T.Krishnamacharya in the mid-20th.
Boiled down to essentials, I believe that these teachers
revolutionized yoga by 1) democratizing
asana and meditation by making them newly accessible to all, and 2) insisting that science and spirituality are
complementary practices, and seeking ways to forge new accommodations
between them.
Considered as a historical development, this synthesis of
yoga, democracy, and science was new – deliberately modern, and culturally progressive.
Most fundamentally, it embodied a commitment to evolving yoga in ways that
would make it most relevant to a rapidly industrializing, globalizing
world.
Realizing this vision required synthesizing ideas and
practices drawn from both Eastern and Western cultures. This fact of
hybridization is precisely, I believe, what enabled yoga to become such an
important force in the world today. Yet, many serious practitioners
remained wedded to the belief that any and all Western influences on the
Eastern tradition of yoga are necessarily negative and corrupting.
This, I think, is simply wrong – both in terms of how yoga historically developed, and how it manifests in society today. When it
comes to the needs and concerns of the contemporary world, synthesizing
East and West opens up critical new space for creative synergy and change.
In contrast, trying to keep cultural traditions separate, pure, and
isolated is not only doomed to failure, but breeds insularity,
defensiveness, and mistrust.
Particularly given the contemporary yoga community’s tendency toward binary East/West thinking, it’s important to emphasize that such processes of hybridization work both ways. Consequently, the development of modern yoga wasn’t as simple as merging a wholly Eastern tradition (yoga) with purely Western ones (democracy and science). Rather, as the process of integration unfolded, each of these categories was hybridized within itself. Concretely, even as yoga incorporated new ideas and practices drawn from the West, the understandings of democracy and science it embodied became partially transformed by the East.
If modern yoga is indeed a partially Westernized practice,
in other words, it’s also one that’s played an important role in partially
Indianizing the West. Rather than rejecting such syntheses as impure and
corrupting, I believe we need to celebrate their creativity, and seek ways
to keep them generative and meaningful.
Throwing
Babes to the Crocodiles
![]() |
| Swami Vivekananda |
Born in Calcutta
in 1863, Vivekananda remains a revered figure in India, where he’s regularly
referred to with such honorifics as the “Father” of modern yoga and Indian
nationalism (a notably significant combination). In the U.S., however,
Vivekananda is no longer well known. Although he caused a sensation in the late
19th century, most yoga practitioners today have never heard of him. This is a
shame, as Vivekananda’s formative role in the making of modern yoga is a
fascinating and revealing story . . .
Yoga and Democracy
While rooted in
ancient tradition, Vivekananda’s presentation of yoga was deliberately crafted
to speak to modern concerns. His belief that everyone could benefit from yoga
broke with traditional schools of thought that held that practices of mental
training and concentration should be revealed to only an initiated few. Yoga,
Vivekananda insisted, should be taught and studied just like any other body of
knowledge. “There is neither mystery nor danger in it,” he wrote. “So far as it
is true it ought to be preached in the public streets, in broad daylight.”
This push to
democratize yoga represented a radical move against the Hindu orthodoxy of the
day. Indian traditionalists had opposed even Vivekananda’s presentation to the
Parliament of Religions. “The Brahmanical priesthood raged and fumed against
him as it is forbidden to a Hindu to cross the ‘Black water,’” recounts
Bhupendranath Datta. “The educated Hindus . . . looked askance and criticized
him as deviating from the orthodox representation of Samatama Dharma” (traditional religious teachings).
Yogic practices
of meditation were even more closely guarded. Traditionally, yoga required an
initiatory process in which carefully selected disciples committed themselves
to learning at the feet of an enlightened guru. Even Ramakrishna, the Indian mystic who was Vivekananda’s own
spiritual teacher, believed that meditative yoga was not suitable for
“householders” – that is, ordinary people who aren’t monks. Vivekananda, in
contrast, believed that if the great yogis of the past had been able to attain
“super-consciousness,” then “you and I can get the same.” “Not only is it
possible, but every man must, eventually, get to that state,” he wrote.
“Experience is the only teacher we have.”
By writing and
speaking about yoga, Vivekananda changed it from an esoteric discipline that
could only be learned through a guru-disciple relationship into a spiritual
technology available to all. Reflecting back on why he decided to speak at the
World Parliament of Religions, Vivekananda replied:
First of all, to bring out the gems of spirituality that are stored up in our books and in the possession of a few only . . . I wanted to make them popular. I want to bring out these ideas and let them be the common property of all, of every man in India, whether he knows the Sanskrit language or not.
Similarly, in an
1895 letter to a friend, Vivekananda explained that he believed that “out of
bewildering Yogi-ism must come the most scientific and practical psychology –
and all of this must be put in a form so that a child can grasp it. That,” he
avowed, “is my life’s work.”
If Vivekananda’s
insistence on democratizing yoga ran counter to Indian tradition, it also
shocked Western sensibilities that viewed Enlightenment rationalism as the
height of human knowledge, and conventional Christianity as the only true
religion. Western civilization, it was widely assumed, was the repository of
humanity’s most important universal truths. Consequently, it shouldered the
responsibility of exporting these truths to the rest of the (presumably
benighted) world. From this perspective – which, at the time, seemed perfectly
respectable – British dominion over India didn’t constitute exploitation and
oppression. Rather, it was shining the light of Western civilization into the
darkness of the heathen East.
![]() |
| The British Raj in India (University of Cambridge collection) |
Vivekananda
attacked these assumptions on multiple fronts. And, his claim that yoga
embodied a universal science of consciousness was central to them all. The “meditative
state” attainable through yoga, he wrote, “is the highest state of existence .
. . It is only the contemplative, witness-like study of objects that brings us to
real enjoyment and happiness.” As such, yoga was deemed capable of accessing
the universal ground of religious experience; one that the West self-servingly
imagined attainable through Christianity alone. Yoga, consequently,
demonstrated that both rational and
extra-rational experiences were valuable capacities of the human mind.
Then-dominant
Western conceptions of mind, in contrast, posited a sharp break between
rationality and religion. Western science was presumed to embody the highest
form of rationality, and Christianity, the one true religion. They were,
however, separate realms. Vivekananda, in contrast, taught that yoga integrates
the rational and the spiritual in ways that enhance our understanding of both.
In this sense, Vivekananda’s description of yoga entailed a 180-degree
turnaround in popular conceptions of the comparative achievements of Western
and Eastern civilizations. Rather than the West being the sole possessor of
universal truths, the East became the source of practices capable of integrating
rational and extra-rational experience in ways that surpassed the limits of
Western knowledge.
Given that Christianity and colonialism had been long intertwined in India, this claim carried significant religious and political repercussions. “Most of the men whom you send as missionaries are incompetent,” Vivekananda railed in an 1865 Detroit lecture. “I have never known of a single man who has studied Sanskrit before going to India as a missionary, and yet all our books and literature are printed in it.”
The Christian nations have filled the world with bloodshed and tyranny. It is their day now. You kill and murder and bring drunkenness and disease in our country, and then add insult to injury by preaching Christ and Him crucified . . . There is the same beauty in the character of Christ and the character of Buddha. It is not assimilation that we want, but adjustment and harmony.
Such contentions
were radical – and influential. “True, perhaps only a thousand or so heard that
lecture,” conceded Mary Louise Burke, looking back many years later. “But a
handful of people with firm convictions . . . can slowly change the thought of
a nation. Moreover,” she added, “Swamiji’s words were spread through the medium
of the press, not only in reports, but in editorials.”
In sum, if Vivekananda
upset Hindu traditionalists by injecting democratic values into formerly
exclusive traditions of yoga, he also disturbed Western chauvinists who
championed their culture as the sole repository of universal truths. In so
doing, he effectively used yoga to democratize existing conceptions of human
consciousness. The ability to attain higher states of awareness, he insisted,
should not be limited by the cultural conceits and social restrictions of either
the East or the West. By insisting that yoga represented a science of spiritual
development universally available to all, Vivekananda democratized dominant
understandings of religion and spirituality – and, in so doing, of the
relationship between East and West as well.
And, if you haven't seen it yet, please also check out this book's companion volume, 21st Century Yoga: Culture, Politics, and Practice (co-edited with Roseanne Harvey) a collection of essays on contemporary North American yoga and its relationship to issues of spirituality, recovery, feminism, body image, community, activism, and more.







Excellent essay, as usual. Carol. Bravo!
ReplyDeleteBob
http://bobweisenberg.wordpress.com/
Just want to mention, without disagreeing with anything you've written, that Vivekananda was just reiterating the universal message of the original ancient Yoga texts.
ReplyDeleteThe Upanishads, which predate even the Bhagavad Gita, state repeatedly that if one understands "Sat-Chit-Ananda" ("Reality-Awareness-Bliss") then one has understood the whole of Yoga, beyond any learned scholar or guru who has not grasped this.
There is certainly not the slightest thing denominational, regional, class-based, or cultural in this essential formulation of Yogic wisdom!
Bob
I love that image of Vivekananda shaking his stick at Western Imperialism. He certainly ruffled a few feathers while blowing minds.
ReplyDeleteCarol, as much as I know you'd rather have a spicey debate than be complimented, I've got to note your remarkable gift for clarity and the craft of teaching.
Your argument for modern yoga is spot on. It's a living art that is only relevant as something more than a museum artifact, if it's being used.
Your desire to see yoga used as a tool for society's evolution is sensible and supported by a shared experience and here by Vivekananda's insistence that it be shared with the world as a beacon.
www.bitchinyoga.wordpress.com
Ph.D. is so abundant with content that it bears a second read(or more) and I'm glad you've offered an exerpt here.
Couldn't agree more. Love Carol's thinking and writing, and I also highly recommend Yoga Ph.D.
DeleteBob
I totally agree Bob & Bitchinyoga, this is a great book and should be read. I like the way Carol has written this in a very smart and relate-able manner.
Delete